E. Tiurnev
To Win
D. Poljak
To Win
Evgenii Tiurnev vs Jeremias Lima-Perez Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L L W
Form
L L L W W L L W L LH2H: Tiurnev 1 - 0 Lima-Perez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tiurnev winning 2 and Lima-Perez winning 0. The last match between Tiurnev and Lima-Perez was at the Romania F13 (Iasi), 12-09-2018, First, Clay with Evgenii Tiurnev getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evgenii Tiurnev | 1 |
| Jeremias Lima-Perez | 0 |
Romania F13 (Iasi)(12-09-2018)
6
3
6
3
| Tiurnev | Stats | Lima-Perez |
|---|---|---|
| 29% (2-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 469 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 265 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 28 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 24 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (375-207) | Career Total W/L | 39% (50-78) |
| $8,595 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiurnev VS Lima-Perez H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Jeremias Lima-Perez
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Tiurnev VS Lima-Perez H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:0 | Average Match Time | 1:21:0 |
| 57% (36/63) | 1st Serve % | 78% (47/60) |
| 78% (28/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (25/47) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 50% (30/60) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evgenii Tiurnev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Yaroslav Demin
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
20
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
6
Aces
23
5
Double Faults
7
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
38 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 3-6 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Felix Einig
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
53%
(
10 of
19)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
21
Total Points Won
23
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Dan Martin
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
12
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
64)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremias Lima-Perez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (375/207) | Win/Loss | 39% (50/78) |
| 62% (812/508) | Sets Win/Loss | 40% (114/168) |
| 54% (6716/5618) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (1139/1301) |
| 60% (101/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 29% (4/10) |
| 64% (159/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (46/68) |
| 69% (115/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 3701 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1519 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:12:7 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 571.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 202.9 |
| 57% (16956/29943) | 1st Serve % | 67% (135/203) |
| 76% (12857/16956) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (68/135) |
| 50% (6507/12987) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (27/68) |
| 42% (1306/3092) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 26% (5/19) |
| 40% (12435/31196) | Return Points Win % | 39% (80/205) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (4/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (37/53) | Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 69% (334/147) | Futures W/L | 39% (48/76) |
| 66% (366/556) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (49/126) |
| 30% (3/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (95/178) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 62% (102/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 89% (356/316) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (51/44) |
| 11% (356/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (51/7) |
| 25% (225/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (77/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
